Women in Law School Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words

Women in Law function - Research Paper ExampleInstead, women know to face many challenges in order to find conquest in an environment which one would consider to be extremely hostile to them. This is the reason why there is need for the continued use of affirmative exploit to contain women who would like to get into this field, to ensure that women be not only successful in getting admitted in law schools, moreover also that they are treated as partners to their male counterparts rather than as subordinates. While in the United States, affirmative action has largely worked to bring women into the male dominated field of law, more still needs to be done to ensure that even more women are interested in it and that once they get there, they are fitted to get fair treatment. There has been, in recent years, support for women to get into the field of law, and most of this support has come from other women in the field. It has been suggested that the best way of encouraging mor e women to get into the field is through and through giving more women opportunities to fill up available leadership roles in law schools. Such a move would ensure that the voice of women is heard in the field and nurture, it will provide them with the opportunity for further advancement. Furthermore, it has been stated that the best way to deal with the problems that women face in law school and after is to prepare awareness that bias against women in law is still immensely strong and that this matter should be addressed. writings Review McGinley (99) in her article states that there is still quite a large gap in the gender divide in the faculties of law schools all over the country. Not only do the women who work in law schools have to do jobs which are considered to be feminine by their male counterparts, but they also have to teach courses which many would consider to have been female-identified courses. McGinley argues that the leadership positions in law schools have been u nfairly distributed, with women getting the lesser share than men. She states that while there are almost no women in any of the available leadership positions in law schools, men dominate nearly all of these positions, with fourscore percent of the deans being men. Furthermore, men have been found to teach courses which can be considered to be honored as well as male-identified furthering the rift between the sexes in law schools. She states that women have to go through differential expectations from their colleagues as well as their students and often have to bear the brunt of their male counterparts intimidating deportment at work. McGinley, in this article bring outs use of manhood studies and other research that has been conducted in the social sciences to make an identification of the gendered structures, practices, and traits that have come to bring harm to women professors practising law. She sets out to provide a hypothetical mount that attempts to make an explanation o f the reasons why women do not enjoy status equality in the sanctioned field do not compared to their male counterparts. While many of the practices, which are conducted towards women in law schools, reckon to be gender-neutral, they end up accomplishing the very opposite, because it works to propagate stereotypes and isolation which has been found to be pernicious to women. The article works to reveal the gendered nature of the structures and practices of law schools, especially in administration, and sets out to challenge the teaching of natural difference as a cause for the disproportion between men and women law professors. The conclusion of the examine conducted in this article is that it is only through exposing these gender biased practices